<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetApp Flash Cache and 64 bit Aggregates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mtellin.com/2010/05/26/netapp-flash-cache-and-64-bit-aggregates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mtellin.com/2010/05/26/netapp-flash-cache-and-64-bit-aggregates/</link>
	<description>NetApp, VMware, Mac and other tech info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: mtellin</title>
		<link>http://mtellin.com/2010/05/26/netapp-flash-cache-and-64-bit-aggregates/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>mtellin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtellin.com/?p=533#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Mark and Mike - &lt;br&gt;Appreciate the responses and the fact that you are saying the same thing tells me what I heard is true.  But I&#039;m curious, do you know the (technical) reasons behind why it doesn&#039;t yet work with 64 bit aggregates?&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark and Mike &#8211; <br />Appreciate the responses and the fact that you are saying the same thing tells me what I heard is true.  But I&#39;m curious, do you know the (technical) reasons behind why it doesn&#39;t yet work with 64 bit aggregates?<br />Thanks,<br />Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Woods</title>
		<link>http://mtellin.com/2010/05/26/netapp-flash-cache-and-64-bit-aggregates/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 05:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtellin.com/?p=533#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Flash Cache (PAM II) will be supported with Data ONTAP 8, and therefore with 64-bit aggregates, in the 8.0.1 release scheduled for later this year.  The original Performance Acceleration Module (PAM) is indeed supported with Data ONTAP 8 today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mark Woods</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>Flash Cache (PAM II) will be supported with Data ONTAP 8, and therefore with 64-bit aggregates, in the 8.0.1 release scheduled for later this year.  The original Performance Acceleration Module (PAM) is indeed supported with Data ONTAP 8 today.</p>
<p>Mark Woods</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dunn</title>
		<link>http://mtellin.com/2010/05/26/netapp-flash-cache-and-64-bit-aggregates/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mtellin.com/?p=533#comment-72</guid>
		<description>The larger PAM II cards (flash cache) currently do not support 64-bit aggregates... should have support in the next 4-6 months.  The original PAM I (16gb) cards will work today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The larger PAM II cards (flash cache) currently do not support 64-bit aggregates&#8230; should have support in the next 4-6 months.  The original PAM I (16gb) cards will work today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

